The U.S. Postal Service is being compelled by a federal court to disclose who financed nine trucks allegedly used to transport up to 1.5 million counterfeit election ballots in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
A federal court is on the verge of forcing the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to disclose crucial information regarding nine trucks allegedly used to transfer up to 1.5 million counterfeit election ballots during the 2020 election in Pennsylvania. According to reports, these ballots played a significant role in tipping the state’s results in favor of Joe Biden. The investigation into this potential election tampering has been reignited after a lawsuit was filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), demanding that USPS reveal who paid for these trucks.
The FOIA case, which is gaining national attention, was detailed in a video update shared by Rasmussen Reports. In the video, former Overstock CEO and political commentator Patrick Byrne outlines USPS’s alleged involvement in facilitating the transfer of the counterfeit ballots. This latest legal move includes an emergency injunction filed against the USPS, pushing the federal agency to be transparent about its role in the 2020 election.
Royal Flush: a brisk walk-through of USPS corruption of election 2020, our FOIA case regarding it, and our emergency injunction against USPS this week.
Our original FOIA case seeking USPS 2020 records: https://t.co/SD63hlz9bU
A good synopsis can be found in the attached post. https://t.co/mkEv7Arxoa pic.twitter.com/jetecW8I3f
— Patrick Byrne (@PatrickByrne) October 13, 2024
The allegations date back to October 21, 2020, when a USPS truck driver, Jesse Morgan, reportedly transported up to a million mail-in ballots from a facility in Bethpage, New York, to Pennsylvania. The facility in question was not authorized to handle First Class mail, raising questions about the legality of the operation. Owen Gregorian, a close associate of key investigators John Moynihan and Larry Doyle, explained on Twitter that Morgan’s truck was loaded with 20 Gaylord containers, each capable of holding up to 100,000 mail-in ballots.
“The mail-in ballots are First Class mail. Every piece of First Class mail is supposed to be imaged per USPS regulations,” Gregorian stated. However, the facility where Morgan collected the ballots was only certified to handle packages and Express Mail. The lack of imaging and tracking has fueled suspicions of foul play, as there is no clear explanation for how such a large volume of ballots passed through a facility not equipped for processing them.
The case has been bolstered by claims that there were actually nine USPS trucks involved in the ballot deliveries, according to further reporting by Rasmussen. However, USPS continues to refuse requests to disclose who financed the use of these trucks, leaving many questions unanswered about the 2020 election’s integrity.
Good Morning !
It’s October … Surprise!
9 trucks. 1 – 1.5 million counterfeit mail ballots in each. The U.S. Postal Service REFUSES to disclose who paid for them. Federal judge to rule this week.
‘81 Million Votes’? Nearly Half Say ‘No Way’ – https://t.co/7bAeXZR79G https://t.co/j9SX5SB9QV
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) October 13, 2024
As the case progresses, it has also been revealed that former Attorney General William Barr allegedly instructed investigators to halt any deeper inquiry into the fraudulent ballot claims in December 2020. This instruction from Barr has drawn accusations of complicity in the alleged election fraud.
Despite the controversy, USPS has yet to release any significant information regarding the financing or logistics behind the trucks, and the court’s ruling could soon shed light on these details. Critics argue that the alleged mishandling of ballots during the 2020 election calls for greater transparency and accountability, particularly as the 2024 presidential election looms.
Rasmussen further noted that this situation could mirror alleged efforts in states like Wisconsin, where questions about election integrity have also surfaced. For those who believe the election was compromised, this case represents a critical turning point in uncovering the truth behind what some have termed a coordinated election heist.
For more information on the legal proceedings, follow updates from Rasmussen.
Credit: Source link
